テキストから

Create a premium vertical "encyclopedia-style teaching card" infographic. It must NOT look like an advertising poster — it should read like a page from a modern reference handbook that a teacher would print and hand out. TOPIC: The Water Cycle STRUCTURE (modular rounded panels, clear title hierarchy): 1. Hero panel — one large, beautifully illustrated cross-section of the water cycle over a coastline: ocean, mountains, clouds, rain, river returning to sea. Label the four stages directly on the illustration. 2. Four numbered stage panels: EVAPORATION — Sun heats surface water; liquid turns to invisible vapour. ~86% of atmospheric water comes from the ocean. CONDENSATION — Rising vapour cools, sticks to dust particles, forms cloud droplets. PRECIPITATION — Droplets merge until too heavy to stay aloft; falls as rain, snow, sleet or hail. COLLECTION — Water gathers in oceans, lakes, groundwater; the cycle restarts. 3. "Key numbers" strip — 97% of Earth's water is salt water · 2% locked in ice · 1% usable fresh water · a single droplet spends ~9 days in the atmosphere. 4. "Common misconception" callout box — Clouds are not water vapour; vapour is invisible. Clouds are condensed liquid droplets. 5. Bottom glossary bar — 4 terms with one-line definitions and small line icons. VISUAL STYLE: clean off-white paper background, soft editorial colour palette (muted teal, warm sand, deep navy text), gentle drop shadows, rounded information boxes, refined thin-line icons, generous white space, strong typographic hierarchy. High information density that still feels calm and readable. Print-ready, publishable quality. All text must be rendered crisply and spelled correctly.

Design a dense, authoritative one-page annual results infographic that looks like a 28-page government report compressed onto a single sheet. Institutional, World Bank / UNDP factsheet visual language. HEADER BAND: placeholder crest block top-left; title "National Water & Sanitation Programme — Annual Results 2026"; right side "Reporting period: 1 Jan – 31 Dec 2026 | Report ref: NWSP/AR/2026-04". SECTION 1 — RESULTS AT A GLANCE (six stat tiles, two rows of three): 1.28M people gained basic water access (+22% vs 2025) · 640 boreholes rehabilitated · 94 schools with new sanitation blocks · $18.7M executed against $21.4M allocated (87%) · 412 community committees trained · 71% of committees still active at 12 months SECTION 2 — BUDGET EXECUTION BY COMPONENT: a horizontal bar chart with five components showing Allocated vs Executed as paired bars, with a variance percentage printed at the end of each row. Components: Infrastructure, Community mobilisation, Water quality monitoring, Capacity building, Programme management. SECTION 3 — GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE: a simple stylised administrative map divided into 8 districts, shaded in five tints by coverage rate, with a graduated legend (0–20% / 21–40% / 41–60% / 61–80% / 81–100%) and the two lowest districts labelled by name. SECTION 4 — RESULTS FRAMEWORK: a compact table with four columns — Indicator | Baseline 2023 | Target 2026 | Actual 2026 — and six indicator rows, each ending in a small status marker (on track / at risk / achieved). SECTION 5 — LESSONS & NEXT YEAR: two side-by-side boxes, each with three short bullets. FOOTER: "Source: Programme MIS, district monitoring visits and household survey (n = 2,140), March 2027. Figures provisional pending audit." STYLE: white background, deep navy and teal palette with a single amber accent reserved for variance and at-risk markers only. Thin 1px rules, no shadows, tabular lining figures, small flat line icons, strict grid alignment, generous margins. Every element carries data — no decorative illustration. Print-ready A4, 300dpi feel. All text crisp and correctly spelled.

Design a single-slide board pack summary — the page a CFO puts up first. Dense, immaculate, consultant-grade. TITLE BAR: "FY2026 Full-Year Review — Board Meeting, 14 March 2027". Right side: "Prepared by Finance | Confidential". ROW 1 — SIX KPI TILES, each with a large figure, a label, a variance chip vs plan (green/red) and a micro sparkline of the last 8 quarters: Revenue $184.6M (+14% YoY, 102% of plan) · EBITDA margin 18.4% (+2.1pt) · Free cash flow $22.8M (91% of plan) · Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x (−0.4x) · Headcount 1,284 (+7%) · Revenue per FTE $144K (+6%) LEFT PANEL — REVENUE BRIDGE: a waterfall chart from FY2025 revenue to FY2026 revenue with five movement bars — Price, Volume, New products, Churn, FX — each labelled with its value and sign. CENTRE PANEL — SEGMENT PERFORMANCE: a compact table, four segments as rows, columns = Revenue $M | Growth % | Margin % | Share of group %. Shade the margin column as a subtle heatmap. RIGHT PANEL — PLAN VS ACTUAL BY QUARTER: a combo chart, grey columns for plan and a dark line with markers for actual, four quarters. BOTTOM BAND — three compact blocks side by side: "Three things that went right", "Three things that did not", "Three decisions we need from the Board today" — three short lines each, numbered. STYLE: charcoal text on white, one deep navy primary, a single amber accent used only for exceptions and asks. Thin 1px card borders instead of shadows, tabular lining numerals, consistent axis treatment across all three charts, no 3D, no gradients, no stock imagery. Extremely disciplined spacing. Boardroom-ready at 16:9. All labels crisp and correctly spelled. ARITHMETIC — MANDATORY: every number shown must be internally consistent. The revenue bridge must start at 161.9 and its five movement bars (+18.7 Price, +24.1 Volume, +12.6 New products, −8.9 Churn, −3.8 FX) must sum EXACTLY to the closing bar of 184.6 — verify 161.9+18.7+24.1+12.6−8.9−3.8 = 204.6 does NOT equal 184.6, so instead use these movements: +14.2 Price, +18.6 Volume, +9.4 New products, −13.8 Churn, −5.7 FX. The four quarterly actual figures must sum to exactly 184.6 (use 42.1, 45.3, 47.6, 49.6) and the four plan figures to 181.0 (use 40.0, 44.5, 47.8, 48.7). The four segment revenues must sum to 184.6.

Design a single-page clinical protocol card — the laminated sheet that lives above a ward desk. Dense, unambiguous, zero decoration. TITLE: "Sepsis — Recognition and the First Hour" · Subtitle: "Adult inpatients · Protocol v4.2 · Review date March 2028" SECTION 1 — SCREEN (a red-outlined band): "Suspect sepsis in any patient with confirmed or suspected infection PLUS a NEWS2 score ≥5, or a single parameter scoring 3." Under it, a compact NEWS2 parameter strip showing the six parameters with their scoring thresholds as a small table. SECTION 2 — THE SEPSIS SIX (six numbered action cards in a 3×2 grid, each with a line icon, the action, and a timing chip): 1 Give high-flow oxygen — target sats 94–98% (88–92% if COPD) · 2 Take blood cultures — before antibiotics, do not delay >45 min · 3 Give IV antibiotics — per local formulary, within 1 hour · 4 Give IV fluids — 500ml crystalloid over 15 min, reassess · 5 Measure lactate — repeat at 2 hours if >2 mmol/L · 6 Measure urine output — hourly, catheterise if needed SECTION 3 — ESCALATE IF (a two-column checklist): lactate >4 mmol/L · systolic BP <90 after 30ml/kg fluid · reduced GCS · NEWS2 ≥7 · urine output <0.5 ml/kg/hr for 2 hours · requires FiO2 >40%. Header line: "Call critical care outreach immediately." SECTION 4 — TIMELINE FOOTER: a horizontal time bar marked 0 min / 15 min / 45 min / 60 min / 2 hr with the six actions placed at their deadline. STYLE: white background, clinical blue primary, a single red used only for the screening band and escalation criteria, grey rules between sections. Thin-line medical icons, tabular figures, tight typographic hierarchy, no illustration flourish, no gradients. Maximum legibility at arm's length. Print-ready A4.

Create a vertical 4:5 social infographic card built for Instagram and LinkedIn — the kind people screenshot and repost. TOPIC: Where Remote Work Actually Stands in 2027 KICKER (small, above the headline): Based on a survey of 12,400 knowledge workers LAYOUT (one continuous card, generous vertical rhythm): - Headline block: "Remote Work in 2027" in oversized type, with a one-line subhead "Five numbers that cut through the debate". - Five stat rows, each a large figure on the left, a short label and one line of context on the right, separated by hairline rules: 63% of roles now offer at least two remote days — up from 41% in 2023 2.4 days average days in office per week, stable for six quarters 18% report they would take a pay cut to keep remote — median cut accepted: 7% 31 min median daily commute time saved, per remote day 1 in 4 managers say they still lack tools to evaluate remote output - A small horizontal bar strip near the bottom comparing three arrangements — Fully in-office 22% · Hybrid 55% · Fully remote 23% — with the bar widths matching those values. - Bottom band: a rounded call-to-action reading "Which number surprised you?" plus a small "Source: internal survey, Q1 2027, n = 12,400" line. STYLE: warm off-white background, one deep ink colour for type, a single electric-blue accent used only for the five figures and the bar strip. Geometric grotesque sans, very large numerals with tight tracking, generous white space, hairline rules, no illustration, no photography, no gradients. Editorial and confident. Every figure must be legible at phone size and all text correctly spelled.

Create a clean cross-functional swimlane process diagram, the kind that replaces a 6-page written SOP. TITLE: "Purchase-to-Pay — Standard Operating Procedure" · Subtitle: "Version 3.1 · Effective 1 April 2027 · Process owner: Finance Operations" FOUR HORIZONTAL SWIMLANES, labelled on the left with a role name and a small icon: REQUESTER · BUDGET HOLDER · PROCUREMENT · ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FLOW LEFT TO RIGHT with orthogonal connectors, never diagonal. Steps as rounded rectangles, decisions as diamonds: Requester lane: 1 Raise purchase request → 6 Confirm goods/services received Budget holder lane: 2 Review against budget → DECISION diamond "Within delegated authority?" — No branch routes up to a small "Escalate to Finance Director" node Procurement lane: 3 Validate supplier & compliance → DECISION diamond "Existing supplier?" — No branch routes to "Onboard supplier (5 days)" → 4 Issue purchase order Accounts payable lane: 5 Match invoice to PO and receipt → DECISION diamond "3-way match?" — No branch routes to a dashed "Exception queue" node → 7 Release payment ANNOTATIONS: print a small SLA chip on each step ("2 days", "1 day", "5 days", "30-day terms"). Add a dotted vertical line marking the control point where segregation of duties applies, labelled "SoD control". BOTTOM STRIP: a legend explaining shapes and line styles, plus three red-outlined "common failure points" callouts pointing at specific steps. STYLE: white background, one blue for the standard path, grey for infrastructure, amber dashed for exception paths. Rounded rectangles with 1px borders, generous internal padding, clean sans-serif, monospace for step numbers and SLA chips. Perfect alignment, equal lane heights, no decoration. Reads clearly when printed A3 or projected.

Create a publication-quality graphical abstract for a life-sciences journal, in clean BioRender style. TITLE (top, single line): "Exercise-induced myokine IL-6 restores hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice" THREE-PANEL VERTICAL STRUCTURE, each panel in its own faint tinted band with a letter tab (A, B, C) on the left: PANEL A — MODEL (blue tint): Two aged mouse silhouettes, sedentary vs running wheel, 8-week protocol. An arrow to a labelled timeline strip: Week 0 baseline behaviour → Week 4 interim blood draw → Week 8 tissue collection. Small icons for open field, Morris water maze and tissue harvest. PANEL B — MECHANISM (green tint): Skeletal muscle releasing IL-6 into circulation → crossing the blood-brain barrier (draw the barrier as a labelled endothelial layer) → binding IL-6R on hippocampal neural stem cells → downstream STAT3 phosphorylation → increased proliferation. Show a dentate gyrus cross-section with BrdU-positive cells marked, and a small inhibitor arrow labelled "anti-IL-6 antibody blocks the effect". PANEL C — RESULT (amber tint): Three small publication-style plots side by side — a bar chart of BrdU+ cells per section (sedentary vs exercise, with significance asterisks), a line plot of Morris water maze escape latency across 5 training days for both groups, and a scatter of serum IL-6 against neurogenesis with a fitted line and r value placeholder. BOTTOM STRIP: a one-sentence conclusion in bold — "Muscle-derived IL-6 is necessary and sufficient for exercise-driven hippocampal neurogenesis in ageing." STYLE: white background, publication palette of soft blue, green and amber tints with dark grey text. Flat vector biomedical icons, uniform stroke weight, small clean sans-serif labels, no shadows, no 3D, no gradients. Every arrow labelled with what it carries. Must remain legible when reduced to a single journal column. All scientific terms spelled correctly.

Create a single vertical image that demonstrates a transformation, split into a clearly labelled BEFORE and AFTER. TOP THIRD — labelled "BEFORE" with a small grey tag in the corner: show a realistic, deliberately ugly spreadsheet screenshot sitting slightly tilted on a plain surface. It is a raw quarterly sales table: default grid lines, unstyled Calibri-like font, inconsistent column widths, some cells filled with clashing yellow and green highlighter, a merged header reading "Q3 SALES BY REGION - FINAL v7 (use this one)", eight data rows of regions with revenue, units and growth columns, a few cells showing ##### overflow, and a stray red comment box. It must look convincingly like a real, messy working file. A BOLD DOWNWARD ARROW between the two halves, with a short label beside it: "Same data. One prompt." BOTTOM TWO THIRDS — labelled "AFTER": the same eight regions rendered as a polished executive infographic panel — a ranked horizontal bar chart of revenue by region with values printed at the bar ends, a row of three stat tiles above it (total revenue, best-performing region, average growth), a small growth-vs-volume scatter to the right, and a one-line insight strip at the bottom. Every number must correspond to the messy table above so the transformation is believable. STYLE: the BEFORE half is intentionally plain, flat and unattractive — no styling, harsh highlighter colours, cramped. The AFTER half is the opposite: white background, deep navy and teal palette with one amber accent, tabular lining figures, thin rules, flat line icons, generous spacing, immaculate alignment. The contrast between the two halves is the entire point and must be immediately obvious at thumbnail size. All text crisp and correctly spelled.

Create a clean technical dimension drawing sheet for a product installation manual, in the style of a manufacturer spec sheet. TITLE: Built-in Wall Oven — Model WO-600 · Cabinet Cut-out Specification Subtitle: All dimensions in millimetres. Drawing not to scale. LAYOUT: three orthographic views arranged on a light technical grid. MAIN VIEW (large, upper two-thirds) — FRONT ELEVATION of the oven sitting inside a cabinet cut-out, drawn as a clean line illustration. Dimension the following with proper engineering dimension lines, arrowheads and extension lines: Overall width 595 · Overall height 595 · Cut-out width 560 · Cut-out height 585 · Door handle projection 45 SIDE VIEW (lower left) — depth section showing: Overall depth 567 · Recess depth 550 · Door open clearance 480 · Required rear ventilation gap 35 PLAN VIEW (lower right) — top-down showing the cut-out with worktop overhang 25 and side clearance 5 on each side. CALLOUT BOX (lower strip, three short items with small icons): Power: 230V / 16A dedicated circuit, socket accessible after installation Ventilation: rear gap must remain unobstructed; do not seal the plinth Weight: 34 kg — two-person lift STYLE: white background, thin uniform 1px black line work, dimension lines in a lighter grey with black arrowheads, dimension values in a clean condensed sans placed in breaks in the dimension lines, a faint blue construction grid behind the views, small view titles in a box under each view. No colour except the faint grid and one blue accent on the ventilation callout. No shading, no 3D rendering, no photographic texture. Must read as a real engineering drawing. All numbers crisp and correctly spelled.